Agreement within a scope
Define a first intervention that is genuinely shared.
To verify. Do not mistake a partial agreement for full consensus.
How do you build a common position without erasing the differences?
A table of several organisations should not produce a consensus for show. It can produce a common position with explicit limits and responsibilities.
The question first.
Then the system.
Organisations with different priorities need to agree on an intervention or a position. The discussion must distinguish what is shared from what remains open.
What evidence is needed. Participants’ mandates, objectives, constraints, sources and proposals. Each contribution is traced back to its remit, without attributing unauthorised representation.
The quality of the discussion
starts with the people at the table.
Who sits at the table is part of the project, not a by-product of the technology. The roles listed here are a proposal to be adapted to the organisation.
Organisation representativesProject leadsPeople involved in the processSubject-matter expertsRepresentatives of the relevant interests
The question not to forget
Who lives with the effects, but is not in the room?
Parties affected by the choice but not present at the table. Their involvement, and any representation of them, must have a declared scope.
Not the right answer in advance.
The reasons for each alternative.
These options are illustrative. In the pilot they are reworked from the evidence and constraints of the chosen process.
Coordinated trials
Compare local trials using common criteria.
To verify. Agree what is comparable and what is not.
Distinct, reasoned positions
Report differences and the conditions for a future discussion.
To verify. Do not turn dissent into an error to be eliminated.
A documented process.
A verification to agree on.
A position paper with shared areas, reasoned dissent, explicit commitments and conditions for review.
- 01Traceability of mandates and positions
- 02Clarity of the commitments made
- 03Verification of commitments within the agreed scope
These are proposed criteria, not results already measured. Baseline, sources, timescales and thresholds must be set before launch.
Explore the process / Guided reading
The question is scoped.
Organisations with different priorities need to agree on an intervention or a position. The discussion must distinguish what is shared from what remains open.
Predefined editorial content. It is not a simulation run by an AI model and it does not produce a decision.
It starts with a real questionDoes this question concern you?
Does this question concern you?
Let’s make it concrete.
Bring your organisation’s context. The first step is to understand whether the conditions exist for a useful trial.
Start a conversation